The Seattle neighborhood Coalition welcomes a diversity of viewpoints and analysis.
Walker: “Where are we going to grow?”
One place where the urbanist perspective on growth and development and the anti-density perspective collide, at least superficially, is that both sides claim to want more widespread participation in the process of deciding how to build Seattle for the next 20 or 50 years. Urbanists talk about the need to provide more information to people who aren’t already engaged, and may not have a ton of flexibility during the day, to help them engage in discussions that tend to be dominated by homeowners and retirees. Density opponents say they’d love to hear what renters and other citizens who aren’t in the typical neighborhood-council demographic have to say, but that those folks just don’t show up to meetings. Both sides appear to agree that more participation by everyone leads to better outcomes.
Where this surface-level unanimity breaks down, however, is in practice. While casual urbanists…
View original post 1,384 more words